The U.S. Supreme Court turned down a chance to change its previous decision that allowed buffer zones around abortion clinics, even though two of the court’s most conservative members were against it.
The court said in two orders that it would not hear challenges to laws in Carbondale, Ill., and Englewood, N.J., that stop anti-abortion activists from “sidewalk counseling” people who are going to an abortion clinic.
The court said in two orders that it would not hear challenges to laws in Carbondale, Ill., and Englewood, N.J., that stop anti-abortion activists from “sidewalk counseling” people who are going to an abortion clinic.Both Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken up the case, but it needed the votes of four justices to be carried out,
Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hill v. Colorado in 2000, lower courts upheld the ordinances in both cities. That decision said that a similar law in Colorado did not violate the First Amendment.
Related Posts
For decades, Alexis Herman built a respected career through public service, leadership, and involvement in national workforce and policy discussions. Known for her work in government and…
My son, Logan, believed that I was just a typical retired man making ends meet through a small pension. I kept letting him believe that. I was…
I honestly believed that Jack’s death would be the hardest thing I’d ever challenge. But then, eleven days after his funeral, I came across a cell phone…
Donald Trump Jr. is tying the knot with Palm Beach socialite Bettina Anderson this weekend, but it looks like his father, President Donald Trump, won’t be in…
Leadership changes at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have placed renewed attention on the ongoing discussion about how disaster response efforts should be managed in the…
Potatoes remain one of the most popular foods across households in Latin America, Spain, and many other parts of the world. Their affordability, versatility, and comforting flavor…