The U.S. Supreme Court turned down a chance to change its previous decision that allowed buffer zones around abortion clinics, even though two of the court’s most conservative members were against it.
The court said in two orders that it would not hear challenges to laws in Carbondale, Ill., and Englewood, N.J., that stop anti-abortion activists from “sidewalk counseling” people who are going to an abortion clinic.
The court said in two orders that it would not hear challenges to laws in Carbondale, Ill., and Englewood, N.J., that stop anti-abortion activists from “sidewalk counseling” people who are going to an abortion clinic.Both Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken up the case, but it needed the votes of four justices to be carried out,
Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hill v. Colorado in 2000, lower courts upheld the ordinances in both cities. That decision said that a similar law in Colorado did not violate the First Amendment.
Related Posts
In a country conditioned to react, this time people paused. The usual reflex—to dissect, argue, spin—gave way to something simpler: concern. Not everyone who watched liked Joe…
For better and for worse, in sickness and in health, and until death do us apart! But is it always like this? Not really, taking into consideration…
Two days after paying out all my money for my son’s wedding, the manager of the restaurant phoned me and his first words were, “Elijah, please, don’t…
Later that afternoon, a family of three walked into the shabby police station located on the Oregon coast. The parents looked devastated and as though they haven’t…
Making three identical meals for my triplets while they teared through the house trying to get ready for school just added to the madness and the chaos…
Cutting open a watermelon and discovering unusual internal cracks can be alarming, especially after encountering alarming social media posts linking these imperfections to chemicals and health risks….