The recent findings by the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have raised

significant concerns about government spending, revealing that the Biden-Harris administration

allegedly awarded hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts to businesses owned by children

and individuals aged 115 and older. These revelations have triggered a wider investigation

into the disbursement of loans and grants under government programs, raising questions about waste, fraud, and potential abuse.

Key Points from the Investigation:
Children as Business Owners:

The Small Business Administration (SBA) reportedly issued $312 million in payments

to businesses that were purportedly owned by individuals under the age of 11.

DOGE flagged 5,593 loans involving such child-owned businesses. Many of these loans

were also associated with incorrect names and Social Security Numbers (SSNs), raising doubts about their legitimacy.

Nearly all of the loans for these child-owned businesses were forgiven after the businesses pledged to avoid staff layoffs,

a provision tied to pandemic relief funding like the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL).
Elderly Business Owners:

Another shocking detail revealed that between 2021 and 2022, the SBA distributed $333 million in loans to 3,095 businesses owned by individuals aged 115 or older, including one case involving a 157-year-old business owner who received $36,000 in grants.
Pandemic Relief Program Issues:

The loans and grants for child- and elderly-owned businesses were part of broader pandemic relief programs intended to support businesses during government-imposed shutdowns.
A number of these businesses appear to have been mismanaged or falsely represented, according to the DOGE findings.
Political and Legal Implications:

The DOGE investigation, now in its seventh week, has also uncovered connections to politically tied entities. For example, a former member of President Trump’s transition team was linked to a nonprofit that received over half a billion dollars for a migrant facility in Texas, which was never used.
DOGE’s findings have spurred political discussions, especially within the GOP. Some GOP members, particularly House Republicans, have expressed concerns about the scale and accuracy of government spending cuts proposed by Elon Musk, an advisor to the Trump administration’s cost-cutting efforts.
USAID’s Spending and Oversight:

DOGE also uncovered significant issues with foreign aid spending, particularly within the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This prompted investigations into $2 billion in payments to contractors that were frozen for further review.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently sided with DOGE in freezing the payments, and DOGE is now looking into potential fraud or misconduct within USAID programs.
Political Fallout:
The ongoing investigations have intensified tensions between different factions of the political spectrum. While some Republicans, including Trump, have voiced strong support for DOGE’s efforts to root out government waste, others, particularly within the Biden administration, have expressed concerns about the scope and potential political motivations behind these investigations. The issue of government spending cuts has become a central topic, with lawmakers grappling with balancing fiscal responsibility and meeting the needs of their constituents.

The situation remains fluid, with many questions about the legitimacy of the grants and loans still unresolved. The investigation by DOGE and the potential for criminal referrals within USAID could lead to significant consequences for government officials if corruption or abuse is confirmed.

In the meantime, DOGE’s investigation and the increasing scrutiny of government spending have resonated with the public, as 72% of Americans reportedly support its mission to uncover fraud and waste. The next steps in this investigation will likely have major implications for both the current administration and the broader government spending landscape in the U.S.