Candace Owens Refuses To Watch ‘Barbie’ Movie: Here’s Why

Mainstream media is fawning all over the “Barbie” movie, but there are plenty of reviewers who were less than enthused about the film’s extreme feminist messaging. Daily Wire host Candace Owens had her opinion on watching the fantasy comedy, which debuted July 21.

Owens explained on Friday why she had no interest in seeing the movie despite extreme marketing efforts meant to convince her otherwise.

“Obviously if you are listening to this podcast, you know one of the things that I really hate is that we are living in a world that is increasingly anti-man. While we are pretending that women are suffering under the foot of the patriarchy, what’s actually happening is that toxic feminism has risen to the top and is actually oppressing men with movements that make entirely no sense,” she said.

Owens went on to give a few examples of celebrities embodying this toxic femininity, including actor Jonah Hill’s ex-girlfriend who accused him of “emotional abuse” and posted private text messages, and singer Bebe Rexha, who reacted badly to her ex admitting she gained weight.

The podcast host said women are frequently “vicious toward men” and this behavior is typically applauded in the mainstream as some kind of feminist victory. Owens said she based her decision not to see the film on a review Sarah Vine wrote for the Daily Mail, which explained some of the issues with “Barbie.”

“I knew I could take her words at face value,” Owens said. The commentator goes on to quote the review, which says, “… My main objection is that Barbie is not really a film about Barbie at all. It’s one hour and 54 minutes of extended misandry, dressed up with a few fun dance routines and one or two (granted fairly decent) jokes.”

“It’s a deeply anti-man movie, an extension of all that TikTok feminism that paints any form of masculinity — other than the most anodyne — as toxic and predatory, and frames women’s liberation not as a movement based on achieving equality between the sexes but as a cultural revenge vehicle designed to write men out of the story altogether,” Vine adds.

“Every male character is either an idiot, a bigot or a sad, rather pathetic loser. If the roles were reversed, and a male director made a film about how all women were hysterical, neurotic, gold-digging witches, it would be denounced — quite rightly — as deeply offensive and sexist.”

Owens said this synopsis was enough to turn her off seeing the movie entirely.

“If that’s what she is trying to convey, that men are either idiots or bigots, or sad and when they demonstrate any form of masculinity they must be put back into their boxes by women. I’m just not interested,” she said.

Related Posts

The significance behind leaving your bed unmade

The state of your bed might seem like a small detail in your daily life—but it could be revealing more than you think. Whether you make your…

Small Panel on Bumper: Why It’s There

Let’s be honest—most of us never give that tiny square or rectangular flap on our car’s front bumper a second thought. It’s just there, quietly blending in…

The Officer Came to Arrest Her—But Rescued a Puppy Instead

I was on my porch sipping lukewarm coffee when the patrol car rolled up across the street. It parked right in front of Miss Lillian’s place—you know,…

How many of the six hidden words can you locate in this living room photo?

If you enjoy puzzles, this viral hidden words image is the perfect challenge. It shows a cozy family scene—dad reading, mom relaxing, kids playing—but six words are…

Instead of throwing a 1942 vanity table away

Others would throw it away, but he had other plans! The master changed an old vanity table dating back to the 1940s beyond recognition!  He shared the before-after photos…

She Ignored His Letters for 53 Years—Until One Visit Changed Everything

After losing her husband of 45 years, 76-year-old Bessie Walsh found herself lonely and adrift. Her daughters lived abroad, and her days were filled with memories and…